Wide World of Women

All your favorite women in one place for 20 years!!!
It is currently Fri Jun 12, 2026 10:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Natalie Morales, Geist fired (US Weekly) or Not (Daily N
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 8:08 pm 
Offline
WWoW Artist
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:48 am
Posts: 5566
johnkay wrote:
NickAdrian wrote:
johnkay wrote:
Did u really have to call savannah portly?

Well...let's see Mr. Kay...I thoroughly checked the rules & regs as well as the definition of portly defined by Websters and concluded that by definition I would not be guilty of of the specific crime you may have impled. Savanahh is portly. It is a fact. Accept it. It does not mean she is not loved or does not have endless admirers. I think you need to deal with that particular reality. If you have issues related to portly please feel free to PM me. I would welcome the chance to discuss your issues with you. Image


i was just saying u didnt need to call her that, your rant has nothing to do with savannah.
didn't say anything about board rules.
for the record, i dont think shes portly and dont care what webster has to say about that.

I whole-heartedly respect your views in all matters of course but, in fact, I did need to mention Savannah to make my point about Lauer's biased remarks regarding Natalie. If I did not my whole point about Lauer's prejudice would have been much less of an example of his bias. Sometimes it is what it is my friend.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natalie Morales, Geist fired (US Weekly) or Not (Daily N
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 8:15 pm 
Offline
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:23 am
Posts: 6403
You're right I meant to say it has nothing to do with savannah's weight. Your original statement would have had the same effect if you said "but praised savannah..." Without the word portly


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natalie Morales, Geist fired (US Weekly) or Not (Daily N
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 8:58 pm 
Offline
WWoW Artist
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:48 am
Posts: 5566
johnkay wrote:
You're right I meant to say it has nothing to do with savannah's weight. Your original statement would have had the same effect if you said "but praised savannah..." Without the word portly

I have to disagree because there are so many members that seem to love...shall we say..."full figured women" instead of well built shapely women like Natalie that aren't disgusting when their massive cellulite legs are exposed.
Don't judge me when I have to see member comments about how Natalie's legs look stringy.


Last edited by Nick! on Sun May 24, 2015 12:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natalie Morales, Geist fired (US Weekly) or Not (Daily N
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 10:00 pm 
Offline
WWoW Artist

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:37 pm
Posts: 3656
Location: Sector 001
NickAdrian wrote:
johnkay wrote:
You're right I meant to say it has nothing to do with savannah's weight. Your original statement would have had the same effect if you said "but praised savannah..." Without the word portly

I have to disagree because there are so many members that seem to love...shall we say..."full figured women" instead of well built shapely women like Natalie that aren't disgusting when their massive cellulite legs are exposed. Trust me...my 2nd wife was beautiful but after a year her legs dripped cellulite down to the ground. It was repulsive. I divorced her after vomiting. Call me shallow but I'd rather be called that then to have to look at thighs that look like walrus flippers ever again.
Don't judge me when I have to see member comments about how Natalie's legs look stringy. Please...they obviously have never been with a real women.

NickAdrian I'm not understanding why you felt it necessary to dis Savannah to make a point about Matt and about your disgust with cellulite. I think Savannah is average for people out in the real world rather than the skewed view of men and women we see in the entertainment and media worlds.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natalie Morales, Geist fired (US Weekly) or Not (Daily N
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 11:02 pm 
Offline
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:23 am
Posts: 6403
NickAdrian wrote:
johnkay wrote:
You're right I meant to say it has nothing to do with savannah's weight. Your original statement would have had the same effect if you said "but praised savannah..." Without the word portly

I have to disagree because there are so many members that seem to love...shall we say..."full figured women" instead of well built shapely women like Natalie that aren't disgusting when their massive cellulite legs are exposed. Trust me...my 2nd wife was beautiful but after a year her legs dripped cellulite down to the ground. It was repulsive. I divorced her after vomiting. Call me shallow but I'd rather be called that then to have to look at thighs that look like walrus flippers ever again.
Don't judge me when I have to see member comments about how Natalie's legs look stringy. Please...they obviously have never been with a real women.


Again, you're bringing up irrelevant issues here, not sure what you're disagreeing with.
Elisabeth is my favorite and many people think she's too thin and like Gretchen better. I don't mind because we each have our own tastes. nobody's forcing you to like savannah or cellulite.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natalie Morales, Geist fired (US Weekly) or Not (Daily N
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2015 8:29 pm 
Offline
Bronze Member

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 5:33 pm
Posts: 1303
people to got to think about this. how long has she been on today show. its like what Alisyn Camerota did. she got tired of being held back and never getting shot for big chair. she has right to complain since she been there so long. if your not chance to shine and have chance for big chair and get held back at time. you have to take look at where your going. since if there no room for improvement in new position. have right to look for work somewhere else. since chance for better opportunity to come up. i been in many jobs where people where not get opportunity to move up since managers where playing favorites or there no space for better opportunity to move up in job since all spots taken.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2008 phpBB Group
subSilver+ theme by Canver Software, sponsor Sanal Modifiye