| Wide World of Women http://wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/ |
|
| Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 http://wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=170114 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | MelvinMoogleman [ Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
I think Bernie may have posted this already. I'm about 98% sure that's fur, having looked at the .ts file very closely (one-handed).  You should be able to download this file (or view directly). http://public.fotki.com/MelvinMoogleman/m/video-caps/12-03-2012-gc-1.html |
|
| Author: | pacificRT [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
You could assume that, but it would have to mean that she's unnaturally pale down there --almost luminesent  Not to get too technical, but you're talking about a spot already set back into the shade by her skirt. To show up that well, whatever we're seeing has to be pretty light to start with (material). Maybe if a studio light happens to be pointed straight on at her from the front, then you may be right...so there's a chance I guess  . |
|
| Author: | MelvinMoogleman [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
pacificRT wrote: You could assume that, but it would have to mean that she's unnaturally pale down there --almost luminesent Not to get too technical, but you're talking about a spot already set back into the shade by her skirt. To show up that well, whatever we're seeing has to be pretty light to start with (material). Maybe if a studio light happens to be pointed straight on at her from the front, then you may be right...so there's a chance I guess . Don't ruin the moment for me. Here's my logic: 1) I've been capturing her upskirts for years and she's never worn skin-tone underwear. 2) The "dark area" is consistent with a natural blonde who trims but doesn't shave. 3) The luminescence is consistent with wearing nude-to-the-waist panty hose 4) I've convinced myself that's what it is 
|
|
| Author: | BMFOTP [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
Could be. In Melvin's defense, her hands look pale. I thought she used 2 slightly fake-n-bake on a regular basis. Not a major tan, just a little. Her hands would have more of a tan even in winter b/c exposure. A lot easier to naturally tan hands w/o trying compared to her crotch. I would expect her crotch to be more pale + they have a lot of lights in the studio. pRT has a great idea. Somebody should required to keep a spotlight on her crotch area, but also a high resolution camera as well. Then there's no debate. If it really is...great. As long as the nice thigh show continues, I'm happy. |
|
| Author: | fordloco [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
As much as I would like to think its natural Gretchen we see, dont think so. Stop the vid if you download it and on the leg cross would almost bet you see the hem of the panties on her right side. Love it anyway. 
|
|
| Author: | MelvinMoogleman [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
fordloco wrote: As much as I would like to think its natural Gretchen we see, dont think so. Stop the vid if you download it and on the leg cross would almost bet you see the hem of the panties on her right side. Love it anyway. They could be crotchless panties. yoda knows I've sent her enough of them.
|
|
| Author: | fredenstein [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
BMFOTP wrote: Somebody should required to keep a spotlight on her crotch area, but also a high resolution camera as well. Then there's no debate. I think we need to have a better cameraman - I nominate Melvin! He'll get the goods! 
|
|
| Author: | MelvinMoogleman [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
fredenstein wrote: BMFOTP wrote: Somebody should required to keep a spotlight on her crotch area, but also a high resolution camera as well. Then there's no debate. I think we need to have a better cameraman - I nominate Melvin! He'll get the goods! I'm up to the task! I've got plans for a Mars Explorer-style camera on all-terrain tracks complete with extra lighting and robot arms for "discrete sample taking." 
|
|
| Author: | BMFOTP [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
Hold on Melvin...We just want you to observe. If you see something of interest, I'll taste...I mean take the samples. Oh what the hell, I'll settle 4 sloppy seconds of that... Thanks Melvin! |
|
| Author: | fredenstein [ Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gretchen's fur, 12/03/2012 |
Melvin to Gretchen: "Show me your white spots".
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|