| Wide World of Women http://wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/ |
|
| Samantha Mohr gone from TWC (D) http://wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=145689 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | IceMan [ Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Samantha Mohr gone from TWC (D) |
She mentioned that her TWC Facebook page was being deleted and she had moved here, http://www.facebook.com/pages/Samantha- ... 4134369263 In her new roll she will only be a fill-in OCM with no regular shift and will do some recorded segments. |
|
| Author: | deltamike [ Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Thanks for the update. That's too bad for me. I enjoyed watching |
|
| Author: | Mister300 [ Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Just when you think TWC management couldn't be any more brain-dead, they out-do themselves. Combined with their pathetically trite and boring "Social" segment, they keep sliding farther and farther into uselessness. But, hey, maybe Cantore can get more air time! /sarc off |
|
| Author: | TK423 [ Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Does NBC = Nothing But Cantore?? |
|
| Author: | denden [ Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
TK423 wrote: :Tantrum Does NBC = Nothing But Cantore?? I agree that knucklehead is taking over the channel soon all the ladies will be gone
|
|
| Author: | newsguy [ Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Mister300 wrote: Just when you think TWC management couldn't be any more brain-dead, they out-do themselves. Combined with their pathetically trite and boring "Social" segment, they keep sliding farther and farther into uselessness. But, hey, maybe Cantore can get more air time! /sarc off Well the advantage of their social segment is more leg time with the ladies. |
|
| Author: | manimal [ Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
|
|
| Author: | IceMan [ Thu Aug 25, 2011 1:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Though I like Danielle Banks, TWC using her over Samantha to fill in weekdays told me that Samantha's role as an OCM would be less. |
|
| Author: | Beazzly64 [ Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
They'll give more time to Eco-Wieners like M. Bettes or some of the other sausage party guys
|
|
| Author: | shizzle [ Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Man, this sucks, they're running off all the women OCMs, I already hardly see Samantha as it is You ladies out there should be happy with the guys on all the time, though! /sarcasm |
|
| Author: | Rubicon [ Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
You mean they're not giving more time to Al Roker? oh man...(please note the sarcasm) I don't even watch that channel anymore. Ever since NBC has taken over, they've gone into the toilet. NBC ruins everything. |
|
| Author: | troy64 [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
| Author: | MOrab46019 [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Really? Kelly Cass has been getting some great air time tonight and last night. |
|
| Author: | TK423 [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
troy64 wrote: :evil: If true, Vivian Brown might wanna be checking over her shoulder...NBC might be wanting younger and/or less on-air hosts?
|
|
| Author: | Gambit [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
TK423 wrote: troy64 wrote: :evil: If true, Vivian Brown might wanna be checking over her shoulder...NBC might be wanting younger and/or less on-air hosts? ![]() Vivian 'Gulf of Texaco' Brown is safe. Those that stutter constantly are given contract extensions. It's those that can perform their jobs flawlessly that are shown the door. Thus is the way of NBCU. Oh, and to the dude above that says NBC = Nothing But Cantore. You're close. It actually means 'Nothing But Crap'. Have a nice day. |
|
| Author: | Backrate [ Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Sam has started wearing some shorter skirts too.sad Can't help but think they are just waiting for her contract to be up or hoping she will just quit On another note, CNN had Nicole Mitchell on Saturday. It was audio only and they were interviewing her about flying into 'canes. Maybe they will Hire her?????? |
|
| Author: | jsaviola [ Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
I'm waiting for them to add Bob Costas to the WC. Surely he must also be an expert on weather, among all the other things he's perfect at! |
|
| Author: | deltamike [ Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr even less TV time (D) |
Backrate wrote: Sam has started wearing some shorter skirts too.sad Can't help but think they are just waiting for her contract to be up or hoping she will just quit On another note, CNN had Nicole Mitchell on Saturday. It was audio only and they were interviewing her about flying into 'canes. Maybe they will Hire her?????? Really? I did not know that. That's an interesting tidbit about Ms. Mitchell. It would be nice to see her again. |
|
| Author: | IceMan [ Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr gone from TWC (D) |
It appears her contract is done and she is now freelancing in the Atlanta area. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Samantha- ... 4134369263 |
|
| Author: | tigershark11 [ Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Samantha Mohr gone from TWC (D) |
That just blows:Tantrum ...Not much interest left in watching the WC. Really horrible programming to watch..Thanks for the update..
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|