Wide World of Women
http://wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/

Rules Clarification
http://wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=14394
Page 1 of 1

Author:  rocky741 [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Rules Clarification

Everyone:

As a member who visits WWoW frequently will know that last week was kind of choatic as far as what is acceptable/unacceptable criticism of the babes. In retrospect, the mods and admins discussed this topic much further and have determined that we may have over reacted to some comments. This has been a fine line to walk and I'd like to apologize to everyone for the chaos that was created because of our duty to have a clean and respectable board. I also would like to apoplogize personally to Johnguard for taking the brunt of the enforcement.

Examples of what would we consider to be acceptable criticism...

The outfit sucked or looked bad on her, etc.
Don't like the new hair cut or color change.
Why does she wear pants all the time? etc.

Acceptable criticism would be something that doesn't affect or insult the person in question.

Examples of what we we consider to be unacceptable critcism...

She's a wh*re, sl*t or anything demeaning or insulting.

We all have our favorite babes and some of us share what he/she would like to do with the babe but becareful of the sexual innuendo comments. We may edit your post if we think you have gone too far. ;)

I hope this helps greatly in understanding what is acceptable or unacceptable comments.

Again my apologies for the chaos that ensued last week.

Rocky

Author:  fishfilletMD [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:33 pm ]
Post subject: 

Bow down and BEG for Johnguard's forgiveness !!!!!!! :bow2 :bow2

:bow2 :bow2 :bow2 :bow2 :bow2

Author:  yodaking [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:35 pm ]
Post subject: 

Doug Swalen wrote:
What about if we criticize the anchors ability to do her job?

*cough*, *cough*, Alexis Glick, *cough*

:P


I might criticize your ability to post :jetserl

Author:  Pool [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rules Clarification

rocky741 wrote:
We all have our favorite babes and some of us share what he/she would like to do with the babe but becareful of the sexual innuendo comments. We may edit your post if we think you have gone too far. ;)


:evil: :evil: :evil:

My life revolves around sexual innuendo. :P

Author:  rocky741 [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

Doug Swalen wrote:
What about if we criticize the anchors ability to do her job?

*cough*, *cough*, Alexis Glick, *cough*

:P


That is where the gray area comes in unfortunately. :?

I do like Alexis' looks but I can't disagree with your thought. There may be some room for that kind of criticism provided it is done tastefully.

Author:  Pool [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

Doug Swalen wrote:
Just cut off the bill paying...that'll get their attention... :jetserl


I`ve thought about it. :Joker

Author:  john guard [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 9:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

i hold no ill will towards the moderators who are just trying to keep order. I APOLOGIZE for pushing the boundaries for spite and ego! i just want to have fun but i know i have used name calling of certain women to taseless leves. i do hate certain celebs and one member here and it is not the one i mentioned in error in a previuos post. i'm sorry to that poster.
i will do my best to keep my posts decent. but please remember EVERYONE, that i "play" stupid and i enjoy it. but do not use real insults on me (you know who you are) when you THINK i am serious. i am 99.9% going for the cheesy laugh or self amusment! (that sounds dirty)!

Author:  fishfilletMD [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 11:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

john guard wrote:
i hold no ill will towards the moderators who are just trying to keep order. I APOLOGIZE for pushing the boundaries for spite and ego! i just want to have fun but i know i have used name calling of certain women to taseless leves. i do hate certain celebs and one member here and it is not the one i mentioned in error in a previuos post. i'm sorry to that poster.
i will do my best to keep my posts decent. but please remember EVERYONE, that i "play" stupid and i enjoy it. but do not use real insults on me (you know who you are) when you THINK i am serious. i am 99.9% going for the cheesy laugh or self amusment! (that sounds dirty)!


I don't trust you. :liar :whistle

Author:  john guard [ Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:05 am ]
Post subject: 

WHO ASKED YOU??
YOU ARE BESMURCHING LISA R, SO YOUR OPINION DONT COUNT!!!!!!!!

NOW YOU TELL LISA YOU REPENT YOUR "FISHY" WAYS!!! :evil:

Author:  james7a [ Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:58 am ]
Post subject: 

is it OK for me to "out" a anchor or shoppng host who is a lesbian or bi??

Author:  LoganGarrett [ Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:07 am ]
Post subject: 

james7a wrote:
is it OK for me to "out" a anchor or shoppng host who is a lesbian or bi??




Only if you send me photographic proof first. :twisted: :jetserl

Author:  james7a [ Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:48 pm ]
Post subject: 

I dont have pics but I saw personally 2 top news and shopping babes in the act.....is THAT good enough?? :jetserl

Author:  picposter [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:  hmmm

what about when someone insults the capper, or his or her work? they may just say f u c k it and not post no more :(

Author:  yodaking [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well that's a different story

Author:  rocky741 [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: hmmm

picposter wrote:
what about when someone insults the capper, or his or her work? they may just say f u c k it and not post no more :(


I hope this answers your question. We may just ban without warning if the comment is flagrent enough.

#5. If you have a problem with a member do not attack each other here or in the chat room. Email them,PM them or take it to another board. Also no flame wars, all that does is create problems. DO NOT BRING YOUR PROBLEMS FROM OTHER BOARDS.

1st offense - Warning
2nd offense - 1 week ban
3rd offense - 2 week ban
4th offense - BANNED FOR GOOD

Author:  jkwong1 [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 2:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

Doug Swalen wrote:
What about if we criticize the anchors ability to do her job?


Hey, does anybody here criticize Anna Kournikova's on-court abilities? I think NOT. :Boxing

Author:  Brettfan [ Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:58 am ]
Post subject: 

There's always something going on when I leave. :shades

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/