From the main paragraph in Peter King's PFT article on Monday, these statements caught my eye:
“On paper,” Russini said Friday, “it’s like wait, she just left the worldwide leader? The biggest sports network on the planet? For
The Athletic? I think when you read that headline, the reasoning honestly isn’t there.”
Continued King:
"This move doesn’t make traditional journalism sense. To think Dianna Russini will almost certainly make more money than Maggie Haberman or David Brooks—
Times legends—and, crazily, might earn more than them combined, is a sign of the strange sports journalism times we live in. Stars who cover the NFL make crazy salaries compared to the money people make covering news that truly matters.
The Athletic hired Russini to be different,
to be a subscription magnet, to tell good stories, to be a difference-maker on the NFL beat, and to break some stories. (Not a lot, but some. You’re not beating Schefter, Rapoport, Glazer, Pelissero with any regularity in this business right now.)
The Athletic wants to be profitable soon (they have bleeding in red ink for a while), and the way to try to do that is to take chances. This is a chance. Russini’s rep at ESPN was as a football firebrand and good beat reporter with a growing list of sources.
Tireless, tough, lover of the game. Her new employer needs American sports fans to buy Russini, and her traits.“Buy” being the key word. With all the free content of NFL stuff flooding the web, will the Russini brand translate into current non-subscribers of
The Athletic paying $71.99 a year to read this smart paysite? It’s a big ask. Very big. But it’s a gamble
The Athletic was willing to take for a rising media person ESPN wasn’t willing to pay like a major star.
ESPN is scaling down, as you’ve seen. After paying stars like Adam Schefter, Adrian Wojnarowski, Stephen A. Smith and Pat McAfee, it’s clear ESPN had a bottom line—and wasn’t willing to put Russini’s compensation far above, if above at all, that of prized NFL reporters like Jeff Darlington and Sal Paolantonio.
Everyone wants to be wanted. In the end, that’s part of why Russini jumped ship.
Two other points. Russini has retained her television rights. So sometime soon (likely next year, but one never knows) you’ll see her on the sidelines or in the studio of an NFL rights-holder. “I’m a TV free agent for the first time in a while, and that was the gem in all of this,” she said. And regarding being a sportswriter: “Challenging, exciting, scary,” she said. “But words are words no matter where they live. Collecting information and telling stories still will be at my core.”
Since leaving WRC/NBC4 Washington D.C. in July 2015, she transitioned nicely after anchoring a few SportsCenter programs and even did some sideline reporting for women's college basketball.
But it is her work with the NFL that has made her one to be reckon with. Listen to one of the podcasts she was featured on March 21 with Adam Schefter. They both traded thoughts on how they desperately tried to lure down New York Jets free agent QB Aaron Rodgers. As tough an interview he is, the subject line definitely applied.
Having done a lot of sports journalism since my senior year in high school--I know exactly where Dianna and Adam are both coming from.
Here is the link:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/157Sm6FI2d9hSGarrMzFPI?si=3b4630badb8d4fdeIn her letter to readers on August 21, she said:
"Like every other day, I sat in a quiet car in my driveway escaping the inevitable interruptions of two babies 14 months apart in order to pick the brains of the NFL’s most informed people. The only thing that changed on this day …was my job.
My first day as the new senior NFL Insider at
The Athletic. After almost 10 years of working at ESPN as an NFL reporter, host, and insider as well as more than 20 years working in local news and national sports television, I headed back to my driveway."
She texted Hall of Fame coach Bill Parcells and was granted a 8 minute interview on this big time career shift (but in the end she spoke with him for 42 minutes mostly about if she was going to get a new washing machine
).
This is truly a bold move for one of the most credible and respected NFL voices who is honest and always gets the scoop that Adam Schefter, the recently retired Chris Mortensen, the late John Clayton, Ed Werder, and a few others usually have it down like adding butter to your favorite pancakes in the morning.
Concluded her introductory note:
"Words are words no matter where they live. Providing context and creating content will always be my job. Along with the rest of the team at
The Athletic, we want to continue to discover NFL stories that allow you to learn more about the league you love. Transactions, injuries, trades and signings will be stories I chase, along with finding out the “whys” and “hows” along the way. I’ll be covering all the big NFL events along with attending the important matchups to bring you as many details and as much information as I can gather. The reporters at
The Athletic are the best in the business, and I hope to find ways to add to their storytelling and reporting. I’ve never been more energized by an opportunity that allows me to tell stories about the sport I love."
Great for her! Even better, she is taking over for Lindsay Jones, who shockingly left for a better position with The Ringer with you guessed it--covering all things NFL.
Bottom line, she will also appear on The Football Show podcasts during some weekday mornings--of which you don't need a subscription. Check it out weekdays on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or even better--just search for The Athletic on YouTube and you can watch and leave questions/comments there.
Finally, this might be answer to a future trivia question? Who replaced Dianna as NFL insiders?
Monday saw Erin Dolan appear on NFL Live, but Dianna's position will be taken over by Lindsey Thiry--who was the full-time ESPN beat reporter for the Los Angeles Rams.
Let's see how Dianna reports on the NFL in online print and most importantly, the comments should be insightful and hopefully no hurtful language or trolls will populate the commentary spaces.