Wide World of Women http://wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/ |
|
Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year (N)... http://wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=170788 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | blm489 [ Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year (N)... |
https://twitter.com/CarrieKeagan/status ... 1353304068 |
Author: | malone42 [ Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year... |
As much as I love the tease she does show and the suggestion she gives to make our immaginations run wild, I don't think she showed anything more than is seen in the video. Otherwise the video camera would have been showing her 'girls' in thier glory instead of down on the crowd. But even the suggestion of her letting 'them' loose is enough to make the blood drain away from the brain. |
Author: | lateapex [ Tue Jan 01, 2013 9:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year... |
Great, accidental optical illusion in this one frame. |
Author: | pacificRT [ Tue Jan 01, 2013 2:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year... |
malone42 wrote: As much as I love the tease she does show and the suggestion she gives to make our immaginations run wild, I don't think she showed anything more than is seen in the video. After some careful examination, I think you may be wrong, Malone...and lateapex too. I don't think that was any optical illusion. Let's go frame-by-frame, as the camera is panning away from Carrie -- Downloadable file: 1.12MB http://www.upload.ee/files/2949040/CKeagan_HNY.mp4.html Pretty obvious that Carrie was letting the girls out to play there...Definitely full exposure (o)(o) Only two questions is: Why was the cameraperson stupid enough to pan away too soon, and is it possible that anyone in the crowd below managed to capture the moment from the front and be willing to share? P.S. -- blm, you may want to adjust the thread title to include " (N) " . |
Author: | fordloco [ Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year (N)... |
Carrie does have a lot to carry there. |
Author: | blm489 [ Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year (N)... |
After further review, the breasts in question are not Carrie's: Carrie (on Twitter): haha happy new year everybody! For the record, not my boobs. https://twitter.com/CarrieKeagan/status ... 5732404224 |
Author: | pacificRT [ Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year (N)... |
Hmm -- saw her denial a while ago, too. At first, I was smelling some damage control, but she also posted another clip that shows her and a Katy Perry-lookalike friend standing to her left, with Carrie being the one holding the camera. Looks like it was shot about the same time the other video was. VIDEO: 1mb http://www.upload.ee/files/2950113/Happ ... 5.mp4.html And yes, her friend's jacket seems to match the one the flasher was wearing. So that may settle it -- Carrie is still pure But look at this way: Her friend is pretty impressive in her own right . |
Author: | blm489 [ Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year (N)... |
I definitely agree with that. There's also another video where the two briefly kiss as the ball drops. |
Author: | malone42 [ Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carrie Keagan rings in the New Year (N)... |
Guess I was wrong about the boobs in question not getting naked but I was right about Carrie being a big tease in trying to make us think it was her doing the flashing... at first and then she got the fun of telling us it wasn't really her doing it. But nice set of knockers on her friend. ( Y ) nice detective work there guys |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |